Profesor ayudante/auxiliar

Bajo impacto, Costo muy alto, Evidencia limitada

+1

Technical Appendix

Definition

Teaching assistants (also known as TAs or classroom support assistants) are adults who support teachers in the classroom. Teaching assistants’ duties can vary widely from school to school, ranging from providing administrative and classroom support to providing targeted academic support to individual pupils or small groups.

Search terms: support staff; adult support staff; teaching assistants; associate staff; classroom assistants; auxiliary teachers; teachers’ aide; education paraprofessional

Evidence Rating

A number of systematic reviews of the impact of support staff in schools have been conducted. However, there are no meta-analyses specifically looking at the impact of TAs on learning. Overall the evidence is limited.

Cost Information

The average cost of employing a teaching assistant, including salary and on-costs, is estimated at about £18,000. Overall, costs are estimated as high.

References

  1. Alborz, A., Pearson, D., Farrell, P., Howes, A.

    The impact of adult support staff on pupils and mainstream schools

    Technical Report. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPICentre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.

    (2009)

  2. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Martin, C., Russell, A., & Webster, R.

    The impact of support staff on pupils’ ‘positive approaches to learning’ and their academic progress

    British Educational Research Journal,37(3), 443-464

    (2011 ,)

  3. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Koutsoubou, M., Martin, C., Russell, A. and Webster, R., with Rubie-Davies, C.

    The impact of support staff in schools. Results from the Deployment and Impact of Support Staff project. (Strand 2 Wave 2) (DCSF-RR148)

    London: Department for Children, Schools and Families

    (2009)

  4. Blatchford, P., Russell, A., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Martin, C.

    The role and effects of teaching assistants in English primary schools (Years 4 to 6) 2000–2003. Results from the Class Size and Pupil–Adult Ratios (CSPAR) KS2 Project

    British Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 5-26

    (2007)

  5. Bowyer-Crane, C., Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Carroll, J. M., Miles, J., & Hulme, C.

    Improving early language and literacy skills: Differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention

    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 422-432

    (2008)

  6. Brown, K. J., Morris, D., & Fields, M.

    Intervention after grade 1: Serving increased numbers of struggling readers effectively

    Journal of Literacy Research, 37(1), 61-94

    (2005)

  7. Burgoyne, K., Duff, F. J., Clarke, P. J., Buckley, S., Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C.

    Efficacy of a reading and language intervention for children with Down syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(10), 1044-1053

    (2012)

  8. Butt, R. and Lowe, K.

    Teaching assistants and class teachers: differing perceptions, role confusion and the benefits of skills-based training

    International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16(2), 207–219

    (2012)

  9. Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Bowyer-Crane, C., Hulme, C., Smith, G., Gibbs, S., & Snowling, M. J.

    Reading with vocabulary intervention: Evaluation of an instruction for children with poor response to reading intervention

    Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 319-336

    (2008)

  10. Ehri, L. C., Dreyer, L. G., Flugman, B., & Gross, A..

    Reading Rescue: An effective tutoring intervention model for language-minority students who are struggling readers in first grade

    American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 414-448

    (2007)

  11. Farrell, P., Alborz, A., Howes, A. & Pearson, D.

    The impact of teaching assistants on improving pupils' academic achievement in mainstream schools: a review of the literature

    Educational Review, 62.4 pp 435-448

    (2010)

  12. Gerber, S.B., Finn, J.D., Achilles, C.M. and Boyd-Zacharias, J.

    Teacher aides and students’ academic achievement

    Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23.2 pp 123-143

    (2001)

  13. Gorard, S., See, B. H., Siddiqui, N.

    Switch-on Reading Evaluation Report and Executive Summary

    EEF, London

    (2014)

  14. Gray, C., McCloy, S., Dunbar, C., Dunn, J., Mitchell, D., & Ferguson, J.

    Added value or a familiar face? The impact of learning support assistants on young readers

    Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5(3), 285-300

    (2007)

  15. Hatcher, P. J., Goetz, K., Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., Gibbs, S., & Smith, G.

    Evidence for the effectiveness of the Early Literacy Support programme

    British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(2), 351-367

    (2006)

  16. Mecrow, C., Beckwith, J., & Klee, T.

    An exploratory trial of the effectiveness of an enhanced consultative approach to delivering speech and language intervention in schools

    International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45(3), 354-367

    (2010)

  17. Mercer, C. D., Campbell, K. U., Miller, M. D., Mercer, K. D., & Lane, H. B.

    Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities

    Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(4), 179-189

    (2000)

  18. Miller, S. D.

    Partners-in-reading: Using classroom assistants to provide tutorial assistance to struggling first-grade readers

    Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 8(3), 333-349

    (2003)

  19. Moore, W. and Hammond, L.

    Using education assistants to help pave the road to literacy: Supporting oral language, letter-sound knowledge and phonemic awareness in the pre-primary year

    Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 16(2), 85–110

    (2011)

  20. Morris, D.

    Using Noncertified Tutors to Work with At Risk Readers: An Evidence-Based Model

    The Elementary School Journal, 106(4), 351-362

    (2006)

  21. Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D.

    The effectiveness of the use of learning support assistants in improving the mathematics achievement of low achieving pupils in primary school

    Educational Research, 45.3 pp 219-230

    (2003)

  22. NFER

    A Randomised Trial of Catch Up Numeracy® Evaluation Report and Executive Summary

    EEF, London

    (2014)

  23. Ritter, G.W., Barnett, J.H., Genny, C.S., & Albin, G.R.

    The Effectiveness of Volunteer Tutoring Programs for Elementary and Middle School Students: A Meta-Analysis

    Review of Educational Research, 79 (3), 3-38

    (2009)

Summary of effects

Meta-analyses Effect size FSM effect size
Single Studies
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Martin, C., Russell, A., & Webster, R. (2011 ,)
-0.01 -
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Koutsoubou, M., Martin, C., Russell, A. and Webster, R., with Rubie-Davies, C. (2009)
0 -
Blatchford, P., Russell, A., Bassett, P., Brown, P., & Martin, C. (2007)
0 -
Brown, K. J., Morris, D., & Fields, M. (2005)
1.18 -
Ehri, L. C., Dreyer, L. G., Flugman, B., & Gross, A.. (2007)
0.74 -
Gerber, S.B., Finn, J.D., Achilles, C.M. and Boyd-Zacharias, J. (2001)
0 - (compared with regular classes)
-0.15 - (compared with small classes)
Gray, C., McCloy, S., Dunbar, C., Dunn, J., Mitchell, D., & Ferguson, J. (2007)
0 -
Hatcher, P. J., Goetz, K., Snowling, M. J., Hulme, C., Gibbs, S., & Smith, G. (2006)
0.15 -
Mecrow, C., Beckwith, J., & Klee, T. (2010)
0.12 -
Mercer, C. D., Campbell, K. U., Miller, M. D., Mercer, K. D., & Lane, H. B. (2000)
1.5 -
Moore, W. and Hammond, L. (2011)
0.79 -
Morris, D. (2006)
0.76 -
Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2003)
0 -
Indicative Effect Size 0.08

The right hand column provides detail on the specific outcome measures or, if in brackets, details of the intervention or control group.

Meta-analyses abstracts